For avid followers of sporting-related businesses, especially publicly traded ones like Nike (NYSE:NKE), the potential departure of golf legend Tiger Woods from his longstanding association with the iconic Nike Swoosh has raised eyebrows. While I don’t closely monitor sports business developments, a recent article from Front Office Sports caught my attention, discussing the likelihood of Woods parting ways with Nike after 27 years.
Reflecting on Phil Knight’s compelling memoir, “Shoe Dog,” which chronicles the founding of Nike, I’m reminded of the company’s rich history and its journey to becoming a global giant in the athletic apparel industry. However, as a shareholder, the prospect of losing a high-profile athlete like Tiger Woods prompts me to share my thoughts on the matter.
All Relationships Have an End Date
Tiger Woods’ association with Nike commenced in 1996 when he was just 20 years old. A 27-year business relationship is no small feat, and both parties have undoubtedly benefited. Examining Woods’ contract history, the cumulative value reached $520 million by 2020. While the current contract details remain undisclosed, the longevity and success of this partnership cannot be ignored.
It’s essential to acknowledge that, like many marriages, business relationships evolve and sometimes come to an end. Woods has contributed significantly to Nike’s brand, donning the Swoosh for more than two decades, and both parties have reaped rewards from this collaboration.
Financial Impact on Nike
From a financial perspective, Nike’s revenue from golf-related products has diminished since 2016 when it ceased manufacturing golf equipment. Woods shifted to TaylorMade, and reports suggest he’s now spotted wearing Footjoy golf shoes, owned by Acushnet Holdings (GOLF). Nike’s golf revenue peaked in fiscal 2013 at $791 million, and while the association may have driven non-golfers to purchase Nike apparel, its impact has waned.
Comparatively, the Jordan Brand, associated with basketball legend Michael Jordan, generated $6.59 billion in fiscal 2023, overshadowing any revenue from Nike Golf. The multiplier effect of Jordan’s association far exceeds that of Woods, contributing significantly to Nike’s overall revenue.
Jordan vs. Woods: A Revenue Comparison
The article explores a multiplier approach, suggesting that Jordan’s association with Nike could be valued at 10 times the revenue, resulting in an estimated $65.9 billion. Applying a similar multiplier to Woods’ impact, the figure is considerably lower, signaling that Woods’ departure may not be as financially impactful for Nike.
While the loss of any athlete is noteworthy, especially after a long and successful partnership, the article suggests that, aside from Michael Jordan, no other athlete has had a truly transformative impact on Nike’s revenue. Nike’s stock performance, lagging behind competitors like Lululemon (NASDAQ::LULU), is identified as a more pressing concern for long-time Nike shareholders.
In conclusion, while the potential separation from Tiger Woods is a notable development, the article suggests that the financial repercussions may be less severe compared to the hypothetical departure of Michael Jordan. For Nike shareholders, the focus may need to extend beyond individual athlete affiliations to address broader market dynamics and competitive performance.
Featured Image: Unsplash
